PJTV: God, Guns, & CNN

DROW42 Says:

Jul 29, 2010 - oh also a peaceful non-violent Jesus does exist, IF YOU READ THE BLOODY BIBLE the last 7 books ( actually 6 don't bother with revelations, just the gospels, acts and letters)

DROW42 Says:

Jul 29, 2010 - the problem is that firearms need to be regulated, universally. Ontario's gun laws are prety strict, and the only guns that end up being involved in most crimes are ill gotten if every state enforced proper education to use firearms safely, store them safely, and to only sell them to licensed individuals. then we'd have a better picture of the number of legal firearms and there for the illeagal. only with everyones cooperation can we stop illegal weapons for being smuggled across our border.

TeamAnDmoto Says:

Jul 29, 2010 - " You don't have a problem with God do ya?" Haha, thats great. Love the Moto to.

thenewchance Says:

Jul 22, 2010 - I don't think people understand the whole part of the argument. When you purchase a firearm, you have to go through a "quick" background check and fill out around 3 pages of paperwork on the spot. Gun control is like making a law against hijacking airplanes and flying them into buildings. Terrorists don't follow that rule for sure, so what makes people think murders will follow a gun rule?

BarthBunzel Says:

Jul 18, 2010 - @upsilon054 that kind of thinking is beyond the ken of the average braindead PJ Media fan

BarthBunzel Says:

Jul 18, 2010 - More simple minded redneck solutions for life's problems, just blast them. Mind you this is from a 2 bit neo-theo-con blog that panders to the severest of braindead evangelicals and cattlelicks who always love to tell everyone how pro-life they are. But Jesus would have blasted dem bad guys with his guns so these guys are just following their god's example

bldgy Says:

Jul 9, 2010 - @kixmet ...and according to Mr. Hamilton, the best way to ensure the "militia" has the skills in the use arms necessary to be considered "well regulated," is to encourage the people to exercise their second amendment rights through the ownership/use of privately owned firearms. Federalist Paper # 29.

bldgy Says:

Jul 9, 2010 - @kixmet It depends on the situation and the laws in your State. You'll have to consult a lawyer or another expert regarding the laws in your area. I can't give you an answer.

kixmet Says:

Jul 5, 2010 - A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Text of the 2nd ammendment

kixmet Says:

Jul 5, 2010 - @bldgy are we immune from prosecution if we shoot in self defence?

duanescot Says:

Jul 2, 2010 - I think its time for a "purge" in American media, if you catch my meaning

drainbamage26 Says:

Jun 28, 2010 - @bldgy well said

Travisab1 Says:

Jun 25, 2010 - God has blessed this car salesman with common horse sense. In todays world a home evasion is a kill or be killed and maybe in a split second. Your family's life is at stake. I don't want my gun unloaded with a trigger lock on the top shelf of my closet in a circumstance like a home evasion.

Joyclifton Says:

May 17, 2010 - Loved it!

CountArtha Says:

May 14, 2010 - Any sentence that starts with weasel words like "Some People" is automatically suspect.

upsilon054 Says:

May 12, 2010 - @ShockwavePulsis I certainly did listen to the whole thing. "God, guns, and guts"? Talk about a non-sequitur! And as any student of high school American history can tell you, people in general carefully put their religion in check when it conflicted with their weltanschauung. As just one example, just as any native American. Cheers!☺

ShockwavePulsis Says:

May 12, 2010 - @upsilon054 Do you listen to the piece at all? He is using capitalism to promote car sales and follows suit with a promotion that he believes in. A gun is not evil, the person that uses the gun can be good or evil. AK47s are legal, if someone really wanted one, they could simply buy one from the gun shop. Does that make it any more or less legal? Provided they follow through with the laws of owning guns, there is no reason whatsoever to not receive this item. Odd promotion, sure, but solid

upsilon054 Says:

May 6, 2010 - Nah, this one was silly. "Don't you love your children?" What the hell does that have to do with anything? So, if I don't own a machine gun, I don't love my children? Wow! Morals have changed, haven't they? As far as the "wimpy Jesus" goes, I guess you can't have any of that. No, you want Rambo of Nazareth. And what do any of you know about the morals of the guy passing out guns? ☺

diskpanic Says:

Apr 19, 2010 - @flaccidpackage This implies that there was MORE matter/energy before. The Big Bang is the strongest scientific theory going, however, there is no explanation at all as to how it occurred, because gravitational forces would have made it strictly impossible for the sum of all matter in the Universe to break free from its own gravitational force. So, in effect, your religious belief is that matter has always and forever existed, amen.

diskpanic Says:

Apr 19, 2010 - @flaccidpackage LOT#1 doesn't prove anything, and you're misusing it. What it says is that energy cannot be lost. In any reaction, any change in matter or energy from one form to another must balance on both sides, where you have a combination of materials on the before side of the equation and some combination of materials on the other side of the equation PLUS HEAT released from the reaction. That's all it says. This implies that matter/energy is being lost and becoming heat.

flaccidpackage Says:

Apr 18, 2010 - @diskpanic My belief (note that I don't claim to know it) is that the universe has always existed. "Science says matter can't have always existed"- Exact opposite, actually, bc LOT#1 says energy cannot be created/destroyed, meaning it has ALWAYS BEEN. "Doesn't appear possible without outside actor" - What makes an 'outside actor' a reasonable solution to the problem? This creates more questions than it solves! How is actor exempt from this "rule of causation?" How did this actor come to be?

diskpanic Says:

Apr 17, 2010 - @flaccidpackage Of course, you don't understand and you don't address first cause. Your only response is that it "has always been", as if that explains its existence and status, even though that seems counter intuitive to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. First cause is an important question, because it doesn't appear possible to answer without an outside actor. The matter can't have always existed, because science says it can't.

flaccidpackage Says:

Apr 15, 2010 - @samvxp You think people believing in god causes nonviolence? Tell that to the radical Muslims around the world that kill in the name of god. Tell that to the Christian and Catholic people who have killed throughout history in the name of god. The majority of people in this world believe in god, and murders are committed in huge numbers all over the world. Are you going to try to tell me that the majority of murders are caused by those that do not believe that there are gods? You're cuckoo...

flaccidpackage Says:

Apr 14, 2010 - @diskpanic Who "traced the universe back to the Big Bang"? No one has, but the Big Bang is a widely accepted theory. Still, I dismiss the question of "where did the universe come from?" in this sense altogether. It didn't "come from". It just "is" What caused the first causer? "God didn't have to be caused!" Nonsense. "Occom's Razor, d-bag, Occam's Razor!" How is a "first causer" that is himself exempt from causation a logical answer to the question? Why suspend the need for a cause @ god?

Taketheride23 Says:

Apr 13, 2010 - Media people are a bunch of out of touch paid off losers.